Short answer: Yes, where the FIR, read as it stands, does not disclose the ingredients of a crime and the dispute is essentially civil. The High Court can quash it under its inherent powers, now saved by Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, applying the tests in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal. A breach of contract or unpaid price, without dishonest intent at the outset, is generally not cheating.
The legal basis
Section 528 BNSS, titled saving of inherent powers of the High Court, replaces Section 482 of the old Code of Criminal Procedure. It allows the High Court to make orders to prevent abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice.
In State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal (21 November 1990), the Supreme Court listed illustrative categories where proceedings may be quashed, including where the allegations, taken at face value, do not make out an offence; where they are so absurd or inherently improbable that no prudent person could proceed on them; where there is an express legal bar; and where the proceeding is manifestly mala fide or instituted to settle a private grudge. The Court said precise and inflexible guidelines could not be laid down.
How courts treat commercial disputes
In Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024), Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra held that cheating and criminal breach of trust are distinct and cannot both arise on the same facts. Cheating needs dishonest intention at the start of the transaction; breach of trust needs entrustment. Non-payment of the price of goods sold is generally a civil matter.
In Rikhab Birani v. State of Uttar Pradesh (April 2025), a bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar set aside an Allahabad High Court order, quashed proceedings arising from a failed property deal, criticised the registration of FIRs in civil disputes and imposed Rs 50,000 costs on the State. In Sudha Rakesh v. State of Karnataka (5 October 2026), the Court quashed a cheating FIR against a power of attorney holder, calling it an attempt at casting the shadow of criminality on a pure civil dispute.
What the petition should show
The petition should place the contract, invoices, payment record and correspondence before the Court, show the absence of deception at the outset, and point out any pending civil suit or arbitration. The Court reads the FIR and the undisputed documents; it does not conduct a trial.
Related questions
Can I seek quashing after the charge-sheet is filed?
Yes. In Rikhab Birani the Supreme Court quashed proceedings after a charge-sheet and summoning order, finding that the charge-sheet largely repeated the FIR and did not show the ingredients of the offences.
Is a pending civil suit a ground for quashing?
Not by itself. But it supports the argument that the dispute is civil, especially where the FIR repeats the same claims as the suit.
Does a bounced payment make it cheating?
Not automatically. Cheating requires dishonest inducement at the beginning of the transaction; a later failure to pay is usually a civil breach unless that intent is shown.
Can I also apply for anticipatory bail?
Yes. Anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS and a quashing petition are separate remedies, and protection from arrest is often sought while quashing is pending.
Practical points
- Collect the agreement, invoices, ledgers, emails and messages showing the commercial nature of the deal.
- Note any civil suit, arbitration or recovery notice already filed by the complainant.
- Check whether the FIR invokes both cheating and breach of trust on the same facts.
- Respond to any Section 35 BNSS notice and keep proof of cooperation.
- Avoid public statements about the complainant while the matter is pending.
Sources: State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1990 (Indian Kanoon); Verdictum, Apr 2025; Verdictum, Aug 2024; SCC Online Blog, 7 Oct 2026.
For a confidential discussion on FIR quashing in commercial disputes, see Criminal Lawyer, Surajpur Court, Greater Noida.
General legal information only; not legal advice or solicitation.

Responses
[…] colour. For FIRs in Gautam Buddh Nagar, the petition goes to the Allahabad High Court. Our note on quashing an FIR in a business or civil dispute explains this […]
LikeLike
[…] quashed such FIRs where there was no dishonest intention at the inception. Our article on quashing an FIR in a business or civil dispute covers this in […]
LikeLike